Karmelo Anthony and Self-Defense: Is his reaction just?

Read Time:5 Minute, 35 Second

It was raining on Wednesday morning, April 2, when Karmelo Anthony, a 17-year-old senior high school student, arrived at Kuykendall Stadium in Frisco, Texas. He was there to watch the UIL Zone 11-5A Championship. During the game, Karmelo sat under a memorial high school tent to avoid rain. Twins and Memorial students Austin and Hunter Metcalf soon noticed the wrong seat. The brothers noticed the mix and told Karmelo that the tent was only suitable for the memory of the students and that he needed to leave. “You need to move,” Austin said, “Let me move… Touch me to see what happened, Karmelo allegedly warned. Austin reportedly stood up, raised his head, moved Karmelo away, trying to remove him from his tent. During a brief melee, Carmelo reportedly reached into his backpack, pulled out a knife, and stabbed Austin, 17, torch Austin (17-year-old) Metcalf) chest. The hunter allegedly held his brother in his arms, Austin hyped, but after the stabbing, he was stabbed for an hour. Self-defense. Self-defense is a popular theme in the United States due to the strong gun rights, personal freedom values, high levels of criminal issues and legal debates. This is because the state’s culture emphasizes gun rights, personal protection, widespread support for personal freedom, and liability laws such as your legislative laws and castle doctrines. The Texas castle doctrine allows a person to use force, even deadly force, to defend himself, their family, vehicle, vehicle, or workplace without retreat. Stand outside your position, expand it to these places and point out if you In a position of legal existence, there is no need to back down. For Karmelo, he is in a place with legal rights. That is, it is conceivable that the court will not focus on this detail. Instead, it is reasonable to focus on whether the case is focused on the use of lethal force in a high school stabbing. Before checking self-defense and lethal force, it is important to note that both are separate laws in Texas. A person may qualify for self-defense, but may not have lethal force. Carmelo's self-defense statement must first be found before determining the legal use of lethal force. According to the Texas 9.31 Criminal Law Code, titled “Self-defense,” it says: “It makes sense for a person to use force against others fairly reasonably with others.” Threats to use their limbs reasonably to defend themselves are not a difficult case to prove. However, the main problem is that Karmelo does not use physical force/self-defense, but uses deadly power, remember that this is an independent, more stringent law. The use of the force or force is instructed by the way of Article 9.32 of Texas, which means “it is either in an effort, or in an urgent effort, or within its intended scope, rather than in order to make the force defined as an action, which is effective, and which is effective. The Criminal Code further explains that it is only in the case where it is necessary to prevent the fatal force from being violated by the situation where it is necessary to determine first whether Karmelo is eligible for self-defense. However, as mentioned earlier, since he has not technically used physical force to defend himself, the court may not find self-defense acts from Karmelo. In similar cases, Texas law only recognizes the use of physical or lethal force, rather than a verbal warning. And since Austin's push was the only action before Carmelo's fatal reaction, this may suggest that Carmelo escalated the dispute and/or was unable to defend himself legally. On the rest of the matter, the court must now evaluate Austin's actions to assess Austin's use of fate, which is a hit, and this is a case of effort. The power of karma. However, the witness statement on the arrest report does not appear to be There are any actions that show support for this claim that lead the court to make a decision. Many misinformation circulated online after the stabbing in Texas, including Austin’s violation of Karmelo’s phone call, assuming Karmelo’s phone call, the fake body involved drugs, and Karmelo was attacked by two brothers. The parents of Karmelo and Metcalfs later denied this, clarifying that the boys had never seen before the incident. And The court will consider the official report's statements and comments online, so that after the legal record of the case, a reasonable response can be made in the case only in substantive circumstances, which is a reasonable threat to the law must be made, which is caused by the law of the law or serious physical injury. If the court does not consider Austin's physical strength to be an attempt to cause fatal or serious injury, then the prosecutor may argue that even if Karmelo's reaction is ever so Even if Karmelo was originally the target of the case. These cases have attracted national attention nationwide, and many views have involved the effect of self-support in many opinions. The case also exacerbates racial tensions as black student Karmelo and a white student Austin are at the center of the dispute, exacerbating an already complex situation. The racial divide has led to threats and allegations from both sides, and there are multiple calls for war to bring it to Metcalf Home and his family have maintained a constant attitude to compete continuously to have a series of actions that have been continuously carried out to a series of scopes. Kala Hayes, the mother of Karmelo Anthony, expressed sadness and frustration at the false allegations circulating online. She stressed her son’s right to just trial and expressed her condolences to the Metcalf family in an ongoing investigation. Austin's father, Jeff Metcalf, also publicly expressed his grief and depression after his son's death. He stressed that the incident was not racially motivated and urged the public to stop politicizing and spreading misinformation about the incident. He has since criticized Karmelo’s claim to self-defense, which is boring, but leaves unresolved issues, sad families and communities struggling to understand what’s going on. Both sides are seeking justice, and the public responds to the emotional and social impact of the case. Today, Karmelo has been released from Collin County prison after bail, which has been reduced from $1 million to $250,000. He and his legal team maintained their self-defense demands while Karmelo is still under arrest.

Source link